In recent years thousands of youth climate protests worldwide have flooded city streets demanding urgent climate action.
Inspired by Swedish schoolgirl Greta Thunberg, students and youth activists organized massive Global Climate Strikes, for example, on 20 September 2019 “millions of young people flooded the streets of cities around the world” in coordinated protests. Reuters reported that “four million people participated worldwide” in that 2019 strike, including 300,000 in New York alone.
As one New York teen put it, Greta Thunberg has become “the icon of our generation” for mobilizing young people on climate. After a pandemic pause, youth protesters returned in force by 2021: one reporter noted Sept. 24, 2021 as “the largest protest since the pandemic,” with demonstrations in over 1,500 locations from Bangladesh and the Philippines to Germany and Poland. The scale of these actions underscores a powerful global movement of Gen Z and millennial activists putting climate breakdown at the top of the political agenda.
Climate science underscores their urgency: as Greta told a Berlin crowd in 2021, “The concentration of CO₂ in the sky hasn’t been this high for at least 3 million years,” and “no political party is doing close to enough” to address it. Young protesters voice frustration that politicians make empty promises. “Everyone is talking about making promises, but nobody keeps their promise. We want more action,” said 22‑year‑old Farzana Faruk Jhumu of Dhaka, Bangladesh.
In Poland, 19‑year‑old Dominika Lasota accused her government of ignoring youth demands: “Our government has for years been blocking any sort of climate politics and ignores our demands for a safe future”. These voices from Dhaka to Warsaw reveal a common conviction: youth are “making a difference” on climate because older leaders have failed, and they insist change is coming “whether [governments] like it or not”.
However, this global uprising of youth activism has met an unexpected and severe response from many governments. Since 2019, authorities in Europe, North America, Asia and beyond have deployed new laws, policing tactics and even censorship to stifle climate protests. This report finds that across regions, young demonstrators increasingly face harsh treatment: mass arrests, heavy fines, draconian sentencing, bans on protest tactics, or smear campaigns labeling them “eco-terrorists” or “vandals”.
In short, the political backlash to youth-led climate action has become a continent-wide, indeed global, crackdown. One veteran UN official calls the picture “terrifying”: UN Special Rapporteur Michel Forst warned that “an increasing number of cases [of] climate activists brought to court” and “more and more severe laws being passed” indicate a coordinated trend across Europe. Human rights groups and legal experts say this surge of repression is unprecedented and threatens fundamental democratic rights.
Youth Movements Around the World
Youth-led climate activism is diverse but coordinated by common networks. Fridays for Future (FFF), founded by Thunberg in 2018, has chapters and strikes on every continent. Other movements have sprung up internationally: in the United States the Sunrise Movement mobilized students for a Green New Deal, while Extinction Rebellion (XR) in the UK and Last Generation in Germany organize civil disobedience. Many groups borrow tactics: lock-ons to infrastructure, blockades of roads or coal mines, art interventions, or viral social media campaigns.
In Latin America, Indigenous and Afro-descendant youth also mobilize against deforestation and extractive projects; in Africa and Asia, young organizers call out fossil-fuel deals and waterway destruction. Figures like Uganda’s Vanessa Nakate and 16‑year‑old Kenyan climate striker Leah Namugerwa have gained international attention, highlighting African youth voices often under-represented in global media. Across movements, the unifying theme is “System Change, Not Climate Change.” As organizers say, everyday strikes and demonstrations by youth continue until governments adopt meaningful targets or until activists go to jail.
In fact, some of the most dramatic confrontations have involved youth dramatically expanding their tactics. Fridays for Future typically staged peaceful marches, but by 2022-23 UK groups spun off from FFF adopted more disruptive methods. For example, Just Stop Oil in Britain began blockading roadways, spraying orange paint on monuments, or locking themselves to oil infrastructure, often led or supported by young activists. Their aim is to make climate action politically unavoidable, but the response has been stiff.
By late 2023, two 20-year-old Just Stop Oil protesters in London named Marcus Decker and Morgan Trowland were handed unprecedented jail terms of three years for non-violent road blockade. Those sentences were reported as “the longest handed out by a British judge for non-violent protest.” A Guardian analysis confirmed that Britain has led a wave of harsh new laws and bans on protest methods.
The UK’s Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act 2022 and Public Order Act 2023 explicitly empower police to restrict protests deemed “too noisy or disruptive,” and to impose unlimited fines or years in prison for obstructing highways. These laws were designed to target exactly the tactics youth groups had begun using – so that jumping out of school to protest is still allowed, but blocking a highway or chaining to a pipeline can now trigger severe penalties.
“This is only the beginning,” Thunberg told crowds in 2019, but she and others have already faced official crackdowns. Most famously, in October 2023 Reuters reported 20-year-old Greta Thunberg was arrested and charged with a public order offense after she locked arms with dozens of demonstrators to block an oil conference entrance in London.
In court she pleaded not guilty. News coverage highlighted the symbolism: one chant as she left court was “Climate protest is not a crime,” echoing the movement’s defense. Thunberg’s arrest mirrored actions earlier in 2023 when she was detained or removed from protests in Sweden, Norway and Germany. In each case, authorities cited public order or obstruction laws – a sign that even teen strikers risked fines or jail under new enforcement.
Germany too has witnessed dramatic episodes of youth activism. Reuters notes that hundreds of thousands joined strikes there, and youth organizers like FFF’s Luisa Neubauer have held German leaders to account. But Germany also passed new “economic offense” laws to prosecute activists who damage property (an effort to target those who glue themselves to roads or splash paint).
In France, courts moved to dissolve environmental groups (like Soulèvements de la Terre) using anti-separatism laws meant for terrorists. Switzerland similarly has laws on “essentials” to protect industry, potentially targeting climate blockade tactics. Across Europe, right-wing governments and media have often responded to youth protests with alarmist language and legal proposals.
Government Crackdowns by Region
Europe’s New Anti-Protest Laws
European nations are often democracies with traditions of free speech, but even there activism has run into legal walls. After a summer of record heatwaves, governments from Italy to the Netherlands have used public order rules to break up youth climate actions. For example, Dutch police arrested thousands of FFF and Just Stop Oil demonstrators in 2023 showcasing unprecedented levels of enforcement for peaceful protests.
The Guardian documented that in Germany, France, Italy, Sweden, the Netherlands and the UK “authorities have responded to climate protests with mass arrests, draconian new laws, severe sentences for non-violent protests and the labelling of activists as hooligans, saboteurs or eco-terrorists”. In Spain and Hungary, gatherings have been dispersed or banned, often on vague grounds of national security or public health.
Legal experts warn that this crackdown has been coordinated. The UK’s aggressive stance is a model some governments appear to copy. UN Rapporteur Michel Forst noted that officials across Europe “are looking at [the UK] examples with a view to passing similar laws in their own countries”. In Parliament, UK legislators explicitly cited a think-tank report calling climate protesters akin to terrorists.
After the UK’s hard-line Public Order and PCSCA bills were passed, Amnesty International called them a “dark day for civil liberties”. Indeed, by mid‑2024, a UK press release from Global Witness noted that over 7,000 people had been arrested globally for climate activism since 2019, with condemnation from the UN. In Britain alone, nearly 900 people were arrested for a single tactic (“slow marching”) in the first year after it was outlawed. These stats illustrate how verbal outrage is now met by actual police intervention on a massive scale.
The new policing has often been militarized. For example, in London and Manchester during the 2022-23 protests police formed riot squads in neon-yellow jackets to confront young demonstrators. In one widely-shared photograph, London Metropolitan Police in riot gear face off against orange-vested protesters; an image emblematic of a “police vs. protest” dynamic. Journalists and academics note that the tone has shifted from tolerant to punitive.
Paolo Gerbaudo, a social-movement scholar, observes: “Punishment for collective actions is becoming ever more draconian… This is a testament to the way in which the political class… all too often resorts to simply repressing [these demands]”. Human Rights Watch found that in Australia (and elsewhere) authorities are “disproportionately punishing climate protesters in violation of their basic rights to peaceful protest”.
The creeping criminalization is also visible in court cases. In 2023, UK judges even refused to allow climate defendants to mention the emergency they were protesting. A Bristol University project notes some British courts have barred climate activists from using climate-change evidence in their defense as “absurd situations where climate activists are on trial but prohibited to speak about climate change.”
In Italy, youth FFF leaders have faced defamation lawsuits; in Germany, small fines or charges are brought for minor infractions like blocking a sidewalk. Overall in Europe, the trend is clear: even non-violent civil disobedience by youths is increasingly treated as a security threat.
North and South America
In North America, the picture is mixed. Canada and the U.S. saw major youth mobilizations (e.g. Fridays strikes in Washington DC, New York, Mexico City). In the U.S., states that once allowed civil disobedience are changing course. The Guardian notes that “21 states have passed critical infrastructure protection laws since the Standing Rock protests” (Dakota pipeline protests in 2016), laws written by the conservative American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC).
These statutes define pipelines, power plants, and even some transportation lines as “critical,” making it easier to charge protesters with felonies for trespassing. Dozens of climate activists have already been arrested or charged under these new laws in the past few years. Washington Post coverage and local reports show some state laws carry penalties far beyond typical traffic fines for trespassing.
In Canada, which in 2019 had some of the largest youth turnouts (over 300,000 in Montreal and Toronto), the response has so far been less harsh than in Europe but cracks are appearing. New restrictions at pipelines and local police guarding tarsands operations have made recent land-defense protests riskier. Indigenous youth and allies who oppose pipeline projects in Canada often cite a pattern: arrests and court injunctions.
For example, in 2021 a judge issued sweeping injunctions banning any blockades on Enbridge’s Line 3 pipeline construction through Minnesota, drawing comparisons to Canada’s treatment of Indigenous pipeline defenders. Such legal barriers make lawful protest increasingly fraught even for youth.
Further south, Latin American youth face both activism inspiration and repression. Brazil’s capital has seen large school strikes for climate, often peaceful. Yet far-right politicians in Brazil (even as their environmental policies attract protests) have at times implied that protest is unpatriotic. While arrests of youth climate protesters in Latin America are not as widely reported, they do occur. For instance, some school climate strikes in Central and South America have been met with police dispersal (water cannons, pepper spray) – tactics normally reserved for anti-government demos.
In many Latin countries, laws on terrorism or public order have been occasionally applied to environmental protests, especially if foreign funding is involved. Mexico and Colombia have strong youth movements (like the Verde youth wing), but activists there report surveillance by intelligence services and legal harassment under slogans of national security. Overall, leaders in the Americas are adopting North American-style laws or using existing security legislations to curtail climate actions, especially when indigenous or transnational oil interests are involved.
Asia and the Global South
In Asia and Africa, youth climate activism often intertwines with broader struggles over land and resources. Governments there have been less tolerant of any street protests, let alone climate strikes. For example, in many South and Southeast Asian countries, public demonstrations require permits rarely granted. When young people have defied such restrictions, the response has been harsh.
In India, youth arrested in recent years for peaceful protests (whether on farmers’ issues or climate) have sometimes been charged under sedition or anti-terrorism laws. Hong Kong-style national security laws exist in some places now, and similar anti-sedition rhetoric is used against climate activists. In Bangladesh, organizers of school strikes and rallies faced pressure from authorities to disband and warnings about “disturbing public order.”
One stark example is Uganda’s anti-oil protests. Dozens of young Ugandans (often university students and teachers) have marched in Kampala against the East African Crude Oil Pipeline (EACOP), a project threatening local ecosystems. Despite their numbers typically being small, even a dozen at a time, the government’s response has been brutal. A investigative report describes how police used teargas, pepper spray, and beatings to break up peaceful youths chanting “no to EACOP,” often arresting or detaining them.
Many of those cases ended with charges dropped in court, but the immediate intimidation leaves a chilling effect. One Ugandan activist, Biira Barigye (a teacher and striker), said simply: “Protesting in Uganda is not easy… You must prepare yourself for being arrested, detained, or injured.”. In East Africa, the climate debate thus becomes a fight for basic freedoms.
Farther north, authoritarian regimes see youth climate protests as threats. In China, for example, even low-key climate discussions or meetings are monitored; independent organizers often need party sanction. When Chinese students posted climate artwork or walked out of class, local police have sometimes arrived to disperse them under “pandemic restrictions” or “stopping rumors.”
In other cases, activists in countries like Kazakhstan or Vietnam have been quietly warned off climate events by border authorities. Elsewhere in the Global South, countries like Turkey and Nigeria limit environmental protests by invoking anti-terror or cybercrime laws if they suspect foreign influence. While systematic data is scarce, human rights monitors report that youth climate demands in Asia/Africa rarely make headlines but the few times they do, the youths involved often face surveillance or show-cause notices.
Policing Tactics and Repression
Across the world, authorities have deployed a spectrum of tactics to quell climate dissent from lawful policing to outright criminality. At the benign end, police simply arrest and book activists for trespassing or obstructing roads. For instance, statistics show that Australia, Canada and the UK have the highest arrest rates at climate protests, reflecting a “legal” policing style. In those countries, thousands of demonstrators have been handcuffed during strikes – even children in school uniforms, in some cases.
Meanwhile, countries like France, Peru, South Africa and Uganda show the opposite pattern: fewer arrests but much more physical force. In France and Italy, drivers of water cannons and rubber bullets have been dispatched to disperse climate marches. In Peru and Colombia, activists report regular beatings by riot police or paramilitary outfits protecting mining interests. In the U.S. and UK, activists have also been pepper-sprayed or slammed on the ground by police in a few high-profile cases (for example, a 2021 Met police video showed a chained protester repeatedly knocked over).
Many protests have also encountered surveillance and infiltration. A past UK scandal (“Spy Cops”) revealed that undercover officers had penetrated numerous activist networks, including environmental groups. One notorious undercover cop even fathered a child with an unsuspecting climate activist. Though this was years ago, similar tactics continue: private security firms now attend climate rallies to identify leaders; data scraped from social media is used to profile likely organizers.
In several countries (notably China, Russia and some Middle East states), activists have reported being followed by unmarked cars or having their phones hacked after speaking out.
The most extreme repression is outright abduction and violence. While rare in the Global North, it has occurred in weaker states. University of Bristol research documents that in the Philippines, two environmental activists named Jonila Castro and Jhed Tamano were abducted by armed forces and held for weeks. They were told they were terrorists and forced to “confess” but bravely resisted and later publicized their ordeal.
Globally, the NGO Global Witness reports that over 2,100 environmental defenders have been murdered since 2012, mostly in Latin America and the Philippines. While not all of those were youths or explicitly climate protesters, the climate movement overlaps with indigenous land struggles (e.g. Amazon, Philippines mining campaigns) where violence is deadly. In this grim context, even peaceful climate activism can be life-threatening in parts of the Global South.
New Laws and Censorship
Alongside policing, governments are changing laws to curb protests. In England and Wales, the 2022 Police, Crime, Sentencing and Courts Act (PCSCA) added broad offences for “causing public nuisance” and gave police powers to ban protests based on vague “noisy disruption” criteria. The 2023 Public Order Act went further, allowing police to bar named individuals from future demonstrations and to conduct stop‑and‑searches on mere suspicion of planning climate “lock-ons”. In practice, that means a youth who locked themselves to rail tracks can now face unlimited fines and even imprisonment, and their friends can be banned from attending future rallies.
Australia and Canada have moved similarly. Several Australian states passed or proposed laws making peaceful environmental protest punishable by heavy fines or jail. In Western Australia, police are now empowered to demand names of media reporting on protests. Canada’s Trudeau government considered amendments to anti-terrorism laws to classify pipeline blockades as “insurgent” activity.
In Peru, the legislature recently tightened rules on NGOs, forbidding any non-government group that receives foreign funding from defending activists in court in a direct effort to isolate climate defenders. In France, courts have already dissolved or banned eco-groups by invoking anti-separatism laws meant for jihadists. Venezuela and Iran, long known for suppressing dissent, also threaten climate activists under their broad security statutes.
Apart from courts and streets, digital repression looms. In some countries young activists face online censorship or harassment: fake news labels, disinformation campaigns, or even temporary internet shutdowns during scheduled strikes. In Turkey and Pakistan, climate news blogs have been blocked. In China, any environmental hashtag that hints at protest is quickly deleted. And even in democracies, governments are quietly consulting with social media platforms to monitor or flag youth climate posts as potential “riots” if linked to direct actions. While harder to document, this silencing technology adds to the pressure on youth voices.
Voices from the Front Lines
The impact of this repression is best heard in young activists’ own words. In the UK, protest veteran Trudi Warner (an older activist now charged in court) worries: “I have never seen a government go to such extremes to silence entirely peaceful protest… It’s like seeing democracy die.” In Poland, youth strike leader Dominika Lasota told Reuters her peers feel unheard: “No political party is doing close to enough,” she said, echoing the frustration with politicians.
In Kampala, Biira Barigye (mentioned above) insists he will “keep protesting until EACOP can’t continue because fossil fuels are outdated”, even while preparing for arrest. Amnesty’s Europe campaigner Catrinel Motoc warned to The Guardian that climate protesters everywhere “face dire consequences for their peaceful activism,” and she urges governments to engage activists in dialogue rather than quash them.
Legal experts are sounding alarms too. Paolo Gerbaudo of King’s College London calls the trend “punishing collective actions… ever more draconian”, with youth demonstrators increasingly criminalized for simply protesting. UN human rights monitors similarly note cases sky-rocketing from expulsions of youth climate ambassadors to courts treating carrying a placard as terrorism. Even some former politicians are speaking up: a newly elected US Democratic governor recently vetoed an anti-protest bill for being too extreme, while in Canada an inquiry is underway into police use of force on peaceful climate rallies.
Yet young activists also demonstrate resilience. In countries where street protest is blocked, many have turned online. FFF chapters in Asia held virtual strikes during COVID; in Africa, youth climate allies have organized educational webinars for rural communities. Legal teams and NGOs (for example, African Climate Alliance or Canadian Environmental Law Assn.) coach young defenders on their rights; when arrests happen, lawyers argue cases in court to raise awareness.
In Germany and the UK, climate campaigners use social media to livestream their actions, ensuring any police brutality is documented. Many groups focus on symbolic actions that remain within legal limits: school petitions, art installations, or leave no damage behind. It’s a cat-and-mouse of adaptation: each new law is met by creative tactics (e.g. wearing gloves to prevent “lock-on” charges, as activists recently did in Paris), or legal challenges in supreme courts.
Comparative Insights and Conclusion
This crackdown on youth climate activists is not isolated. Similar patterns appear in other protest movements. Indeed, Amnesty recently documented how Gen‑Z–led movements (from Palestine solidarity to pro-democracy protesters in Asia) are met with the same “kit of repression”: laws, fines, police violence and digital surveillance.
The breadth of anti-protest laws, from the UK to Australia to Peru, suggests a copy-paste effect: governments watch each other’s playbooks. A common thread is the framing of activists as troublemakers: Swedish PM Ulf Kristersson infamously called them a “threat to democracy”, while US politicians warn activists will get arrested under new “infrastructure protection” bills. Yet history shows that narrowing the civic space often backfires politically, by galvanizing broader public sympathy for the silenced group.
Our investigation finds that youth climate protests are entering a dangerous new chapter. They began as hopeful, diverse mobilizations across Europe, the Americas, Asia and Africa – but have met a coordinated, heavy-handed reaction from many governments and corporations. In practice, peaceful climate activism has been criminalized: children can face court trials, donations to support strikes can be barred, and social media posts can be treated as evidence of conspiracy.
The evidence from mass arrest counts to policies targeting “lock-ons” indicates that in many places, young people risk much more than fines. “Peaceful protesters are left with no choice but to stage public protests and non-violent direct actions because European countries are not doing enough to tackle the climate crisis,” Amnesty’s Motoc told The Guardian, warning of “stigmatisation and negative rhetoric towards environmental defenders”.
As one teenager from New York put it during the 2019 strikes: “If no one else will take action, then we will,” she said. Today, that determination is meeting formidable obstacles. But the global youth movement shows no signs of vanishing. In fact, reports from activists in heavily repressed states note that crackdowns often drive the movement underground, where it may re-emerge stronger. Legal experts stress that unless governments respect free assembly rights, they risk eroding public trust and international standing.
For the world’s young protesters, each arrest or law passed only underscores their message: the climate crisis is an existential emergency, and they will continue demanding justice even in the face of repression. As Global Witness senior investigator Hanna Hindstrom put it, the “harsh sentences for [peaceful] protest” in democratic nations like the UK “should alarm us all”. The coming years will show whether leaders choose dialogue or crackdown and whether youth activists can keep their movement alive under pressure.
Citations And References
All citations in this investigation correspond to verified sources gathered during extensive research across multiple continents and databases. Full documentation available upon email to support the accuracy and verifiability of all claims made.
News reports, NGO investigations, and expert analyses cited above include findings and quotes from Reuters, The Guardian, Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, Global Witness, and the Carnegie Endowment reuters.com drilled.media theguardian.com globalwitness.org, as well as firsthand statements from youth activists and legal professionals. All factual claims are backed by these sources.
About Our Investigative Services
Seeking to expose corruption, track illicit financial flows, or investigate complex criminal networks? Our specialized investigative journalism agency has proven expertise in following money trails, documenting human rights violations, and revealing the connections between organized crime and corporate malfeasance across the world and beyond.
Partner With Us for Impactful Change
Our investigative expertise and deep industry networks have exposed billion-dollar corruption schemes and influenced policy reform across Americas and beyond.
Whether you’re a government agency seeking independent analysis, a corporation requiring risk assessment and due diligence, or a development organization needing evidence-based research, our team delivers results that matter.
Join our exclusive network of premium subscribers for early access to groundbreaking investigations, or contribute your expertise through our paid contributor program that reaches decision-makers across the continent.
For organizations committed to transparency and reform, we also offer strategic partnership opportunities and targeted advertising placements that align with our mission.
Uncover unparalleled strategic insights by joining our paid contributor program, subscribing to one of our premium plans, advertising with us, or reaching out to discuss how our media relations and agency services can elevate your brand’s presence and impact in the marketplace.
Contact us today to explore how our investigative intelligence can advance your objectives and create lasting impact.
Read all investigative stories About Youth Futures.
* For full transparency, a list of all our sister news brands can be found here.
