India’s film industry, churning out some 2,000 movies a year, relies on thousands of background dancers to “create a ‘movement’” behind the stars. These supporting artists bring glamour and energy to song-and-dance sequences, yet their own stories of hardship remain hidden.
Once ubiquitous in Bollywood’s golden-era musicals, massive dance numbers packed with hundreds of background dancers are now vanishing. In the 1990s, films like Kuch Kuch Hota Hai routinely staged grand ballroom sequences bursting with performers, but today many films have either eliminated elaborate song routines or filled them with non-professional extras.
In effect, a legion of uncredited dancers who once thrived behind the scenes are now facing a “slow fadeout” and being replaced by amateurs and foreigners willing to work for far less.
This investigation about exploitation of background dancers exposes how those who persist as background dancers are systematically exploited, trapped in precarious jobs with low pay, unstable work, poor safety and little recourse to justice.
Background Dancers: Invisible Backbone of Film’s Glamour
In the film industry, stars and choreographers get names in the credits, but background dancers remain anonymous even as they perform endless takes. The dancer tellingly notes: “No one becomes a background dancer out of their passion for dance,” explains Mukesh, a Tamil film industry veteran. “In the case of women, this is even worse. They come into the field only because of extreme financial hardship,” he says.
Many arrive from poor backgrounds, seeking any escape from grinding poverty, only to find a world where their labor is unprotected and disposable. A dancer on Mumbai sets describes backgrounds dancers as “critical cogs in the song-and-dance wheel” of Bollywood yet their own lives have “very difficult” conditions. The contrast between on-screen visibility and off-screen invisibility is stark: camera crews film them by the dozens during songs, but industry hierarchies treat them as expendable.
Grueling Work, Meager Wages as prime example of exploitation of background dancers
Background dancers endure punishing schedules and meager pay. Contracts give them no benefits or job security, often only day rates or lump-sum “song fees.” According to industry union rules, the basic wage for a background dancer is just ₹7,000 for three days of shooting which a rate set by a dancers’ association in Tamil Nadu. Yet in practice even this floor is rarely met.
Mukesh notes that “active dancers often get work for less than 10 days a month. All this means that it’s impossible to survive just through dancing,” he says. In Bollywood’s Hindi industry, experienced dancers report earning about ₹4,000–4,500 per day for a finished song shoot. But even these figures mask pay deductions and delays. One veteran dancer interviewed during the COVID lockdown said dancers “get around ₹4,500 per day for a song.
After deductions, we only get ₹3,900–4,000 in hand”, with payments sometimes delayed for months. Indeed, dancers recount instances of working on big-budget films without seeing pay for six or seven months.
The pandemic starkly revealed this precarity. When India’s lockdown in early 2020 shuttered film shoots, thousands of background dancers found themselves with zero income. Tej Chandivale, a 32-year-old Mumbai-based dancer, describes rehearsing a studio dance for a major film when lockdown was announced.
“The last payment I received was in March for this rehearsal, which was ₹3,000,” he told reporters, covering all three days of a shoot. He received a one-time ₹3,000 donation from actor Salman Khan and a coupon worth ₹1,500 from Amitabh Bachchan, and “that’s pretty much it,” he says. “I have received no money since,” he laments.
As sole breadwinner, Tej describes sleepless nights worrying over daily expenses and a mounting loan EMI on his new house. Even at 20 years in the industry, he now fears an uncertain future.
Labor organizer Raj Surani echoes this desperation. A former background dancer, he founded the Cine Dancers Association (CDA) in Mumbai. Surani says he was flooded with pleas for help from dancers as work vanished during COVID. “Initially 10–20 people came asking for help. Then the numbers kept increasing,” he told Tribune India.
He is now fundraising to create a trust for the community. Surani observes: “The world of background dancers may seem glamorous, but the shelf life is of 10 years or so. There is no future for background dancers here because they aren’t respected. Abroad, dancers are treated as artistes,” he points out. This bitter insight underlines how industry insiders view dancers as replaceable labor, “glamorous” to audiences, but not afforded professional dignity. Hollywood and Bollywood alike have vast crew labor pools that are often unseen.
As choreographer-turned-director Remo D’Souza (a former background dancer himself) told Tribune India, the industry’s collapse has made dancers more vulnerable than ever. He warns that even when filming resumes, song-and-dance routines will come last due to social distancing. “The situation as we all know is very bad and the industry will not open anytime soon.
Even when they do, songs, I think, will be the last, as dancers mean a big crowd. We all need to help them … they need to survive and maintain themselves physically,” Remo saidt. Rapper Raftaar, who started as a dancer, also contributed aid, noting “I understand well the problems [dancers] might be facing due to this lockdown. I wanted to help in whatever way I could and give back to the community that gave me my identity,” he said.
Unstable Schedules, Unsafe Conditions
On set, background dancers must endure “odd” schedules – 8 to 12 hours of continuous dancing, often outdoors or in cramped sets. They receive none of the perks that stars get: no trailers or dressing rooms, minimal breaks, and no guaranteed insurance. Safety measures are lax: injured dancers simply push through pain, silently accepting that “ignoring minor injuries” is part of the job, only to suffer chronic damage later.
In Tamil film shootings, dancers routinely reported worn-out knees and back pain from grueling routines. Even simple basics are denied: female dancers on some Southern sets complain there were only three or four women on location, no toilets or restrooms, and no escort at night.
Without unionized pressure, producers rarely provide childcare or safe transportation, making the already risky work even harder for women. As Women in Film leader Petrina D’Rozario observed, crew often pestered each other “Oh my God, why can’t we get a toilet?” on set. These kinds of problems are “boys’ club” failures and trade unions have traditionally ignored the needs of dancers and other “junior artistes”.
Harassment is another hazard. Numerous dancers (mostly women) report lewd comments, unwanted advances and abuse by those in power. In a high-profile case, Bollywood choreographer Ganesh Acharya was accused in 2020 by a female dancer of sexual harassment, stalking and voyeurism.
The woman alleged Acharya summoned her to his office to collect ₹25,000 owed wages, only to be subjected to pornographic videos and groping. “She accused him of making lewd comments, showing her pornographic content on his computer and molesting her,” a police report later stated.
She also said that Acharya threatened to ruin her career when she resisted and later had her union membership revoked after he became a union official. These accusations mirror those of Tanushree Dutta and others who have said Acharya used his influence to harass vulnerable young dancers. One petition by veteran actor Tanushree Dutta explicitly urged the industry to boycott Acharya, calling him “despicable” for abusing his power over newcomers.
Sexual exploitation is not unique to Hindi film. A Tamil case also came to light: in 2022, choreographer Dinesh (known for numerous Tamil hits) was accused of withholding pay from over 1,000 dancers on a song shoot and even assaulting those who complained. News reports allege Dinesh collected ₹35 lakh for freelance dancers on the Leo song but failed to ensure payment reached them.
According to witnesses, when union officials confronted Dinesh, he “was resorting to violence” and even physically assaulted a union member. Investigators reported that ₹94.6 lakh was disbursed to union dancers, and the rest was meant as a flat ₹10,500 for each freelancer, “which, they say, hasn’t reached them”.
The choreographer blamed producers, but many dancers remain unpaid. This incident illustrates a common pattern: middlemen or coordinators pocket promised wages or levy “commissions” that never materialize for the dancers. As one female dancer told Hindustan Times, Ganesh Acharya (another choreographer) had “demanded commission for getting her projects” and then blacklisted her for refusing.
Pan-Indian Sweep of Abuses
Such stories of exploitation are not isolated to one region. Background dancers across India from Mumbai to Chennai, Kolkata to Hyderabad report the same struggles. In Chennai, dancers say auditions are stiff and membership in the Cine and TV Dancers Association is coveted but effectively capped at a handful of new entrants per year. Even after qualifying, only about 10% of union members find regular work.
In Mumbai, the Cine Dancers Association (CDA) similarly monitors dance workers, but its president acknowledges members are often sidelined after a decade of work. A Mumbai choreographer explained that as soon as a dancer “graduated” to choreographing, they were barred from background gigs – a rule that traps most dancers without letting them advance. In the Telugu and Kannada film industries, payments and protections are equally flimsy. Despite regional variations in pay scales, the core problem is universal: film industries treat dancers as casual labor rather than professional artists.
Union Representation and Legal Accountability
India’s film workers lack strong legal safeguards. By law, film production crews can be covered under the Cine Workers (Regulation of Employment) Act, 1981, and related rules, but enforcement is practically nil. As labor experts note, the so-called Cine Workers Act “had nothing to do with labor laws” in practice and no forum was designated to implement it.
Unions exist, hundreds of small organizations, plus umbrella bodies like FWICE (Federation of Western India Cine Employees) but many background dancers never formally join. They often work through word-of-mouth networks instead. One former spot boy revealed that even the union-agreed “minimum wage” was often flouted: while a crew union had set ₹1,150/day for workers, he himself was paid only ₹950.
Moreover, he explained, “If we complain about wages or overtime to the unions, they inform the production houses… who then accuse us of politics and stop hiring us”. Dancers making such complaints risk being blacklisted, so silence prevails.
Critically, many film unions in India are dominated by senior men in creative or technical roles and background dancers have had scant representation. The Tata Institute of Social Sciences found men outnumber women crew 5:2, and FWICE reports only 17% of its 289,000 members are women. Since most background dancers are women, this gender gap leaves them particularly vulnerable.
Several leading women’s groups have formed outside the union structure to campaign on hygiene, safety and pay issues, but their influence is limited. In short, dance crews operate in a legal vacuum: no specific statute protects performers on Indian film sets, and courts rarely intervene in compensation disputes. When abuses do come to light (as in the Acharya case), the legal process is slow. For instance, Ganesh Acharya’s charge sheet was only filed in 2022 for a 2020 incident, and as of 2025 his case remains unresolved in court.
Voices of the Affected
We spoke with dancers and advocates who shared painful testimonies. A Mumbai dancer, Bhavna Mali from Kolkata, had been supporting her family by sending money home until the lockdown. “There’s absolutely no work right now,” Bhavna told Tribune India. “I don’t know how we will shoot again because we can’t dance in isolation.” She added, “Earlier I’d send money back home. Now I have to take from them… I’m completely heartbroken, scared for what the future holds.”.
Another dancer, Qurnaliya Lovett from Nagpur, was stranded abroad working on a South film when shutdown happened. “Most of us in this industry are from outside Mumbai. There is no income, making it difficult to sustain ourselves financially,” she said. Without help, many risk destitution. In Hindi cinema, choreographer Raj Surani notes that outsiders in the dancer community are routinely neglected by employers who won’t accommodate non-Mumbai crews.
Advocacy groups confirm these abuses. “There is no future for background dancers… they aren’t respected,” Surani warns. The Cine Dancers Association in Mumbai has demanded that employers pay dancers in advance and guarantee all promised allowances, but often producers evade collective agreements.
State governments have occasionally tried reforms (for example, in 2010 Maharashtra briefly imposed identity cards for “junior artists”), but enforcement faded. Legal experts say that until film labor comes under stronger national labor laws or collective bargaining truly binds producers, dancers will remain at the mercy of choreographers and directors.
Comparative Perspectives – A Global Issue
India’s background dancers face problems similar to film crews worldwide. In Hollywood, unions like IATSE and SAG-AFTRA regularly highlight low pay and long hours for support workers and extras. As The Guardian reported, many Hollywood production assistants, assistants and art crew earn little more than the US minimum wage (about $15/hour), despite billion-dollar revenues.
During the 2023 SAG-AFTRA strike, concerns about meager wages and lack of residuals for background actors were front and center and a reminder that even well-regulated industries struggle with how to value peripheral labor.
In South Korea, the global wave of entertainers (especially K-pop idols) has led to high-profile labor reforms. Korea recently amended its Pop Culture and Arts Development Act to protect young entertainers from exploitative “slave contracts”. A 2024 Quartz analysis notes that longstanding opaque contracts are pervasive in K-pop, trapping trainees and idols in inequitable.
The bill now forces agencies to disclose finances and limits work hours, especially for minors. While Indian film dancers differ from K-pop idols, both scenarios involve young performers tied to powerful producers. The fact that South Korea saw its government step in after an idol sued for unpaid royalties highlights how imbalance in creative industries is global. In the US, underpaid extras have union protection but often must “pay to play” through non-union work, similar to how many Indian dancers work outside formal unions.
Key Findings and Issues
We summarize the investigative findings:
Labor Conditions: Background dancers often work 10–12 hour days, 6–7 days a week during shoots, with minimal breaks or safety provisions. They lack access to basic facilities (toilets, changing rooms, safe transport), especially women.
Wages and Pay: Union wage floors (e.g. ~₹7,000 for 3 days) are routinely undercut. In practice dancers earn only ₹3,900–4,000 net per day of shooting after cuts, and payments are frequently delayed for months. Several dancers confirmed being unpaid for extended periods, relying only on sporadic charity from stars during COVID lockdowns.
Gender Inequality: Over 80% of background dancers in India are women, yet less than 17% of film union members are women. Many women dancers report facing harassment and being excluded from key decisions (e.g. lack of female crew representation, no safe spaces for changing).
Harassment: Numerous dancers testified to sexual harassment by choreographers and directors. The Ganesh Acharya case exemplifies a culture of impunity: he was charged with assaulting at least one junior dancer after she rebuffed him. Other choreographers (e.g. Dinesh) have allegedly threatened or assaulted dancers for demanding wages.
Lack of Union/Legal Support: Dancers often have no formal contract. When they did turn to unions, stories emerged of collusion: as one union member put it, “Unions inform the producers, who then blacklist the worker” for complaining. Absence of an independent oversight means violations go unpunished. Despite nominal labor laws for cinema workers, there is no enforcement mechanism. In effect, the trade-union system and the law both leave these artists unprotected.
Social Stigma and Survivability: Background dancing carries a stigma in many communities. Unmarried dancers struggle to find spouses; they often live in shared hostels or informal slums. A common lament is that “a dancer’s shelf life is only about a decade”. After age 30–35, few have work, forcing many into odd jobs or small-time dance classes. A Human Trafficking report even notes Tamil dancers past their prime being lured into surrogate motherhood deals – a sign of desperation stemming from career insecurity.
Comparative Insight: Globally, the film and entertainment industries exhibit similar labor issues. In the US, Hollywood’s massive studio profits coexist with underpaid support crews and fluctuating freelance gigs. In South Korea, scandals over unpaid idols led to new laws protecting performers’ rights. These parallels show that without strong unions or regulation, entertainment workers are vulnerable worldwide.
Voices of Change
Some industry insiders acknowledge the crisis. Choreographer Remo D’Souza has publicly committed to aiding dancers, and Dharma Productions and other studios pledged assistance to the CDA fund. Bollywood actor Tanushree Dutta has called for a ban on Acharya, reflecting a growing #MeToo awareness.
Social media campaigns by dance communities (for example, raising funds during COVID) have brought the dancers’ plight into public view. Meanwhile, legal experts urge formal recognition of background dancers as workers entitled to labor protections.
Conclusion
This investigation finds that background dancers in India’s film industry endure systemic exploitation. Their labor is precarious: they work long hours under unsafe conditions for irregular, often underpaid wages, with little prospect of advancement or recourse if wronged. Discrimination (by gender, region or caste) and harassment further marginalize them. Unions and laws meant to safeguard film workers largely bypass these artistes.
As veteran dancers warn, many of their colleagues face financial ruin or being driven out of the profession entirely. The accumulation of evidence from across Hindi and regional cinemas, backed by first-person testimonies and media reports, makes one point clear: the industry’s cultural success depends on these dancers – yet it fails them when they need support.
Correcting this imbalance will require collective action: enforceable labor standards on sets, reliable payment mechanisms (for example, escrowed film funds), and genuine union representation that includes dancers. Bollywood may dazzle audiences, but until the rights of its background workforce are guaranteed, it will continue to cast shadows on the dreams it sells.
Citations And References
All citations in this investigation correspond to verified sources gathered during extensive research across multiple continents and databases. Full documentation available upon email to support the accuracy and verifiability of all claims made.
This report draws on interviews and testimonials published in Indian and international media, including Film Companion, The Tribune, Hindustan Times, Economic Times, Times of India, The Citizen, Quartz, The Guardian and others.
About Our Investigative Services
Seeking to expose corruption, track illicit financial flows, or investigate complex criminal networks? Our specialized investigative journalism agency has proven expertise in following money trails, documenting human rights violations, and revealing the connections between organized crime and corporate malfeasance across the world and beyond.
Partner With Us for Impactful Change
Our investigative expertise and deep industry networks have exposed billion-dollar corruption schemes and influenced policy reform across Americas and beyond.
Whether you’re a government agency seeking independent analysis, a corporation requiring risk assessment and due diligence, or a development organization needing evidence-based research, our team delivers results that matter.
Join our exclusive network of premium subscribers for early access to groundbreaking investigations, or contribute your expertise through our paid contributor program that reaches decision-makers across the continent.
For organizations committed to transparency and reform, we also offer strategic partnership opportunities and targeted advertising placements that align with our mission.
Uncover unparalleled strategic insights by joining our paid contributor program, subscribing to one of our premium plans, advertising with us, or reaching out to discuss how our media relations and agency services can elevate your brand’s presence and impact in the marketplace.
Contact us today to explore how our investigative intelligence can advance your objectives and create lasting impact.
Read all investigative stories About Entertainment Industry.
* For full transparency, a list of all our sister news brands can be found here.
