India’s deeply entrenched caste system has fueled generations of protest by Dalits, Adivasis and other marginalized communities demanding equality and justice. Yet in many of these anti-caste rallies, the state response has been harsh and often violent.
From the streets of Maharashtra to the villages of Uttar Pradesh and the forests of Chhattisgarh, activists report being met with baton charges, tear gas, mass arrests and sometimes even live gunfire. Legal experts note that such “overt police brutality, especially against marginalised groups, has long been rampant in India”.
In this investigative report about police brutality in anti-caste protests in India, we chronicle key incidents (Bhima Koregaon 2018, Una 2016, Hathras 2020 and others) and wider trends of the police using excessive force or legal muscle (UAPA, sedition charges, etc.) to suppress anti-caste protests. We include first-hand testimonies, analysis by lawyers, comparative global insights, and verified data to expose how India’s law enforcement often betrays its constitutional duty in caste-related conflicts.
Historical Context: Caste, Protest and the State
India’s Dalits (Scheduled Castes), Adivasis (Scheduled Tribes), Bahujans and other oppressed communities have led movements against caste atrocities for decades. Pioneers like B.R. Ambedkar and grassroots groups such as the Dalit Panthers laid a foundation of resistance. They invoked the Indian Constitution’s promise of equality, particularly the Prevention of Atrocities Act (POA, 1989) designed to protect SC/ST communities.
Yet police often fail to act on Dalit pleas; in some notorious cases, law-enforcement turned a blind eye to caste violence. For instance, after seven Dalit men were brutally flogged in Una (Gujarat) in 2016, the state CID concluded that “police personnel misused their position by not acting against the perpetrators” and even connived with them. Officers were eventually charged for dereliction of duty, but only after massive Dalit agitation exposed the collusion.
As caste protests have grown, rights groups observe a disturbing pattern: authorities frame dissenters as criminals or “terrorists.” In Maharashtra’s Bhima Koregaon event (2018), Pune Police arrested dozens of rights activists. The charge-sheet claimed these Dalit-rights activists had “waged war against the nation” under the anti-terror UAPA, alleging Maoist conspiracy.
Supreme Court Justice D.Y. Chandrachud later dissented in reviewing the case, accusing police of “negative bias” and urging a Special Investigation Team. Such tactics reflect a broader trend: rather than protect protesters’ rights, police often weaponize tough laws (UAPA, sedition) to intimidate activists.
Bhima Koregaon (Maharashtra, 2018)
In January 2018, Dalit activists gathered at Bhima Koregaon to mark a historic victory against a Maratha ruler. The event—symbolic of Dalit pride—turned violent when armed Hindutva activists attacked the Dalit crowd. In the chaos, one person died and several were injured. The local administration soon launched two investigations: one against the Hindutva attackers, and another sweeping inquiry alleging a Maoist conspiracy behind the incident.
Seventeen months later, Pune Police began arresting Dalit-rights activists and lawyers, including Varavara Rao, Gautam Navlakha, Sudha Bharadwaj and others, under UAPA and sedition. Shockingly, many arrestees had not been at Koregaon; authorities accused them via a second FIR of “waging war against the nation”.
For example, activist Rona Wilson was accused of planning violence and even plotting to assassinate the Prime Minister—claims later contested by a US-based forensic report, which suggested evidence files had been planted on his laptop. Regardless of the veracity, the effect was to bar many elder activists from bail: by late 2021, over a dozen remained imprisoned for years.
Justice Chandrachud, in dissent, noted the Pune Police investigation displayed a “negative bias” against the accused. He urged an independent SIT probe, highlighting how police can misuse terror laws to stifle Dalit dissent. Human rights lawyers cite Koregaon as a defining example of authorities rebranding anti-caste protesters as enemies of the state.
Una Dalit Uprising (Gujarat, 2016)
The Una incident in July 2016 triggered nationwide Dalit anger. Four young Dalit men were publicly flogged by cow vigilantes for skinning a dead cow—a horrific caste atrocity. Villagers responded with the “Azadi Kooch” (Freedom March), a large protest march to Una’s police station, demanding justice. Witnesses report that during these marches, “armed men on motorbikes tried to create an atmosphere of fear. The police were mute spectators.”
In other words, Dalit protesters say police stood by while vigilantes attacked them. Four officers at the Una station were later charged for dereliction of duty, accused of inaction and of forging FIR documents to protect the attackers. One local leader recalled how the police did nothing even as Dalits were beaten for hours. This neglect underscored a systemic bias: law enforcement ignored atrocities against Dalits and only acted when caught on camera.
After the Una floggings, many police stations across India saw similar scenes: Dalits were beaten and when they protested, police either joined in or turned a blind eye. In some cases, protesters faced immediate crackdowns. These confrontations led to dozens of caste-based atrocity cases being registered under the SC/ST Act (though many victims say convictions are rare). Importantly, legal experts note that authorities often treat Dalit protests as public disorder rather than as grievances, justifying baton charges and mass arrests.
Hathras Gang-Rape and Massacre (Uttar Pradesh, 2020)
The September 2020 Hathras case brought Dalit protest into India’s headlines. A 19-year-old Dalit woman was gang-raped, beaten, and left to die in her village. When she succumbed to her injuries, the police unilaterally cremated her body at 2AM against the family’s wishes. This act ignited fury. Thousands of Dalits planned to hold a protest in Hathras demanding justice. Eyewitnesses describe “protesters [being] met by police who charged them with batons,” as the family and supporters tried to block the cremation.
One witness told reporters: “We begged the authorities and police that we wanted to perform the last rites in the morning but they did not listen to us… We were put behind the barricades they formed using the police force. We could not even see the face of our dead sister.” These government barricades and baton charges were widely condemned. In New Delhi and Kolkata, activists held solidarity protests; the UP Chief Minister even ordered an inquiry into the police action.
Nevertheless, families reported that dozens of Dalit mourners and journalists were roughed up on site. One protester, wearing an oxygen mask (due to COVID), later described being shoved and beaten by Uttar Pradesh officers. The Human Rights Watch and other NGOs noted that the Hathras police “charged protesters with batons” despite the mourners being largely unarmed.
This brutal response highlighted a pattern: Dalit women’s victims and their relatives frequently get treated as troublemakers. In 2020 alone, numerous cases of Dalit women’s protests (against rapes or killings) saw harsh crackdowns in UP and elsewhere.
Activists cite Hathras as emblematic of how caste intersects with gender and class in police violence. The United Nations and EU publicly urged India to address caste killings; a Reuters survey of Hindu-majority nations even likened Hathras to black-majority Bangladesh, underscoring global concern. (By comparison, Dalit protest in Nepal following caste massacres saw police clash with demonstrators as well)
Regional Cases of Police Brutality in Anti-caste protests in India: Maharashtra, Tamil Nadu, and Beyond
Maharashtra (other than Koregaon): In addition to Bhima Koregaon, Maharashtra has seen other police clashes in Dalit contexts. In 2018, Dalits protested a Dalit youth’s arrest at a police station in Pune; officers reportedly lathi-charged the crowd. In rural Yavatmal, anti-untouchability rallies often face surveillance. Rights monitors note a militarized police response when Dalit groups enforce local proclamations (e.g. banning caste discrimination) in water wells or temples.
Tamil Nadu: Tamil Nadu has a long history of anti-caste movements (Periyarite and otherwise) and relative daylight to Dalit assertion. However, police brutality still occurs. For example, in 2017 a rally in Salem was attacked by police after youths hoisted Ambedkar’s flag in defiance of a hardline Hindu group; protesters were baton-charged, dozens beaten and detained.
Environmental protests with Dalit-led tribes in TN (like the prolonged anti-nuclear Koodankulam/Idinthakarai struggle) have also ended with lathi-charges and tear gas. (In one TV broadcast, women and children in Koodankulam were chased by riot police into the sea, where officers allegedly threatened to shoot them.) These episodes show that even in states with progressive politics, caste-based dissent can trigger police force.
Tamil Dalit Leaders Under Watch: Notably, progressive police forces in Tamil Nadu have ironically targeted Dalit leaders under harsh laws. In 2018-19 police raids were carried out on Dalit rights NGOs and leaders such as R. Thirumavalavan’s team, linking them to Maoists despite lack of evidence. This echoed the Koregaon pattern: activists’ homes were raided, and books and laptops seized, under the pretext of national security. The tactic appeared aimed at pre-empting Dalit mobilization around the nationwide agitation against the dilution of the SC/ST Act in 2018.
Other States: In Uttar Pradesh and Madhya Pradesh, mass protests by Dalits (e.g., over OBC quotas or Atrocity Act rollbacks) have been dispersed by police with tear gas and lathis. Rajasthan Dalits calling for stronger caste laws have faced baton charges in Jaipur. Delhi’s 2018 Bharat Bandh saw burning police vehicles, and security forces responded with force in areas like Ghaziabad. Even in BJP-ruled states like Gujarat or Himachal Pradesh, Dalit rallies on matters such as temple access and land rights have seen aggressive policing. (For instance, when a Lower Caste community in MP tried to enter a temple in 2018, police fired on the crowd.)
A police constable with a lathi near a Goa mining protest (2018). The widespread use of lathis (batons) by officers during protests demonstrates the state’s default tactic of force. In Goa in 2018, for example, locals protesting against a mining ban (amid tribal land disputes) encountered riot police lining the roads with lathis.
Similarly heavy mobilizations occurred in Chhattisgarh’s Bastar region, where Adivasi villagers have long protested mining projects and deforestation. In December 2023, security forces tore down tribal protest sites and opened fire with live rounds on peaceful demonstrators demanding land rights. Front Line Defenders reports on Bastar document “unprecedented violence”: on Nov 24, 2023 a protest camp was destroyed by officers who “brutally assaulted protestors and destroyed property”.
According to rights monitors, dozens of peaceful Adivasi protesters were beaten, shot at, or falsely charged with terrorism, as the state invoked the UAPA to silence local leaders. These accounts echo Dalit experiences: in both cases, ordinary citizens exercising their right to dissent were met with police bullets instead of dialogue.
Police and the Law: UAPA, SC/ST Act, and Impunity
Investigative journalists and lawyers highlight how police justify brutality under sweeping laws. The Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act (UAPA) is intended for terrorism, yet has been used to detain dozens of activists, including many from anti-caste movements. In the Koregaon case and Bastar, state agencies labeled movement leaders as Maoists under UAPA, a tactic that prevents bail and casts dissent as sedition.
At the same time, authorities have sought to weaken the SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act itself. In 2018, protests erupted nationwide when the Supreme Court imposed procedural curbs on the Atrocities Act, essentially diluting its protections. Dalit organizations warned this would embolden police and upper-caste violence; indeed, within months at least six people were killed in protest clashes during a Dalit bandh.
Even routine policing is marked by skew. Studies have shown that crimes against Dalits are less likely to be registered. As one Nepal human rights advisor put it in 2020, Indian police often ‘refuse to register crimes against Dalits or dismiss them as accidents’.
Indian courts have also criticized law enforcement. In late 2023 the Bombay High Court remarked that 70-year-old activist Anand Teltumbde, who spent two years in jail under UAPA, had no evidence against him and had been unduly detained.
Yet despite such rulings, lower courts across India are reluctant to grant bail in caste protest cases. A joint 2019 report by human rights NGOs documented “torture and custodial deaths” in 42 caste-linked cases over five years, indicating impunity.
Constitutional experts note that police brutality in caste contexts often violates fundamental rights, freedom of assembly (Art. 19), life and liberty (Art. 21), and equality (Art. 14). India’s apex court has on occasion condemned excessive force. For instance, the Supreme Court has held that the right to protest peacefully is sacrosanct. But in practice, aggressive policing tactics prevail.
Lawyers point out that chants against caste oppression or slogans invoking Ambedkar have even been cited as evidence of criminal intent in FIRs. In effect, the constitution’s guarantees are undermined when the instrument of law (the police) adopts caste prejudice as policy.
Comparative Perspectives: A Global Pattern
India’s plight is not unique. Globally, movements of oppressed groups often meet state violence. The Black Lives Matter protests in the United States brought international scrutiny to police brutality; as one analysis notes, “militarism…spread…into civilian life” and police violence against minorities is rampant. Like Indian Dalits, African Americans have faced aggressive crowd control tactics and dubious legal charges when protesting.
In Nepal (another caste society), June 2020 street marches over Dalit killings saw police and protesters clash; Reuters reported “five protesters and seven police [sustained] minor injuries” in one Kathmandu rally. In France, police use of force against Roma or immigrant demonstrations has drawn criticism; in Brazil, favela youths protesting police violence have been shot or tear-gassed.
Experts argue that India’s pattern – branding social protest as “extremism” – mirrors other nations where dissent is equated with terrorism. A Yale Journal of International Affairs commentary noted how the US grappled with the image of “police brutality against Black Americans” since Ferguson and Minneapolis.
Similarly, China’s state media have mocked Western critique by highlighting India’s caste police violence. The global lesson is that entrenched prejudice (whether racial or casteist) often corrupts policing. India’s Dalit struggle thus resonates with indigenous and minority movements worldwide, underscoring that the fight against police oppression is part of a broader human rights struggle.
Voices from the Ground
The human cost of these crackdowns is best told by those who lived them. Dalit protest leaders, lawyers and families speak of fear and resilience. One Dalit activist described being beaten by police during a 2020 rally in Mumbai, injuries to her arm still raw months later.
Atribune (a Dalit weekly) recorded testimonies of women who were separated from their children when riot police cordoned off a remembrance march in Telangana. Even government officials have occasionally broken silence: a CID official in Gujarat flatly stated that Una villagers’ flogging “triggered a massive unrest” because officers ignored it.
Human rights groups like the All India Dalit Mahila Adhikar Manch (AIDMAM) and the Adivasi Adhikar Bachao Manch frequently hold press conferences on police cruelty. AIDMAM’s director noted after Hathras that “the police treated our children like criminals… such brutal acts send a message to all Dalits.” In courts, Dalit lawyers have criticized encounter killings of Dalit youths as staged. International bodies also speak out; the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights has urged India to ensure caste victims have full protection under law.
Unfortunately, many victims remain anonymous. In Bihar’s Lakhisarai district (2019), when Upper-Caste mobs burned two Dalit men alive, locals said they were aided by police who “tipped them off” about police movements. In Uttar Pradesh’s Chitrakoot (2017),
Dalit women marched for jobs only to be baton-charged, survivors recall being struck on their stomachs and backs as they lay on the road. These stories, often passed on via social media or grassroots reports are rarely in English media but testify to a grim reality: in numerous villages and cities, protesting caste injustices invites state violence.
Data and Trends
Quantitative data underscores the crisis. Government statistics (NCRB) show Dalits suffer the lion’s share of violent crimes, yet conviction rates for atrocities remain below 50%. In 2018-2019, Dalits comprised 16% of India’s population but accounted for over 41% of victims in heinous crimes.
Meanwhile, at least 42 police firing deaths were recorded in protests across India between 2015-2020, many during agrarian or tribal sit-ins and several of these had a caste dimension. Reports by NGOs indicate hundreds of arbitrary arrests of Dalit activists under UAPA since 2017.
The Covid pandemic also saw spikes: as lockdown laws went unevenly enforced, Dalit and Muslim neighborhoods were often targeted for curfews and cordons. Amnesty India warned in 2020 that emergency powers were being misused to detain marginalized leaders.
In the digital realm, hundreds of Dalit activists faced frivolous charges: for example, 23 journalism and student activists involved in caste rights lost jobs or scholarships after being booked. These facts paint a picture of systemic, not sporadic, abuse.
Conclusions
Our investigation finds that the Indian state’s reaction to anti-caste protests has too often been punitive and brutal, betraying constitutional ideals. Across states and decades, the pattern is clear: Dalits and Adivasis exercising their democratic right to protest are frequently met with baton, bullets, and baseless charges.
Police impunity persists because investigations rarely go beyond superficial probes, and when justice is eventually dispensed, it often comes under public pressure rather than automatic enforcement of laws.
We have documented multiple instances where police not only fail to protect oppressed communities, but actively collaborate with higher-caste vigilantes, only reversing course under national scrutiny.
We have shown how India’s counterterror laws and sedition provisions are misapplied to crush dissents, and how even constitutionally protected protests are branded “violent mobs.” The voices we have cited from grassroots activists to Supreme Court justices uniformly demand accountability. As Amnesty International and UN experts note, this struggle is not simply a domestic issue but a human rights imperative.
Going forward, solutions include stringent oversight of police conduct, scrapping draconian provisions used against protesters, and training forces in human rights. Crucially, political leaders must repudiate caste biases in law enforcement. The courts too play a role; higher judiciary should more actively review instances of excessive force (as Justice Chandrachud urged in Koregaon). Meanwhile, civil society must keep pressure: global solidarity movements (like Black Lives Matter’s network) have raised international awareness, which in turn has prompted Indian authorities to respond (even if defensively).
In sum, India’s narrative of progress is clouded by these episodes of state violence against its most vulnerable citizens. Only by confronting these injustices openly – on the streets, in courts, and through journalism – can the promise of the constitution be realized for everyone, regardless of caste.
Citations And References
All citations in this investigation correspond to verified sources gathered during extensive research across multiple continents and databases. Full documentation available upon email to support the accuracy and verifiability of all claims made.
About Our Investigative Services
Seeking to expose corruption, track illicit financial flows, or investigate complex criminal networks? Our specialized investigative journalism agency has proven expertise in following money trails, documenting human rights violations, and revealing the connections between organized crime and corporate malfeasance across the world and beyond.
Partner With Us for Impactful Change
Our investigative expertise and deep industry networks have exposed billion-dollar corruption schemes and influenced policy reform across Americas and beyond.
Whether you’re a government agency seeking independent analysis, a corporation requiring risk assessment and due diligence, or a development organization needing evidence-based research, our team delivers results that matter.
Join our exclusive network of premium subscribers for early access to groundbreaking investigations, or contribute your expertise through our paid contributor program that reaches decision-makers across the continent.
For organizations committed to transparency and reform, we also offer strategic partnership opportunities and targeted advertising placements that align with our mission.
Uncover unparalleled strategic insights by joining our paid contributor program, subscribing to one of our premium plans, advertising with us, or reaching out to discuss how our media relations and agency services can elevate your brand’s presence and impact in the marketplace.
Contact us today to explore how our investigative intelligence can advance your objectives and create lasting impact.
Read all investigative stories About Caste Politics.
* For full transparency, a list of all our sister news brands can be found here.
