The boom in IT outsourcing has led most American companies to hire external developers, but at what cost? Recent data show 94% of businesses use some form of IT outsourcing, often to save money (72% cite cost-cutting as the reason). Yet despite the scale an estimated $541 billion global market in 2024 many firms find that trusted agencies demand unexpectedly high fees or fail to deliver promised work.
This investigation examines top U.S. web development agencies and how some major players overbill clients. We reviewed consumer complaints, interviews with affected businesses, and expert reports, and even looked abroad: agencies in India, Ukraine, and the UK face similar scrutiny. The findings are alarming.
Many marketing and development firms flaunt modern coworking offices and startup-style lofts to impress clients. In the image above, a California tech workspace (Source: Perplexity) is shown.
While such spaces suggest innovation, several businesses we spoke with say the polished image belies deeper problems. Across Silicon Valley, New York, Austin and beyond, disgruntled clients report hidden fees, substandard work, and unresponsive teams, even when an agency presents itself as a “premium” provider.
For example, one small-business owner who hired a well-known U.S. agency found its “relationship credit” was worthless, and ended up disputing charges entirely for undelivered work. “Small businesses should not be left bearing the cost of substandard freelance matches from a platform that presents itself as premium and curated,” the client wrote, criticizing the disconnect between slick marketing and actual service.
Big Names and Broken Promises of Web Development Agencies
We first scrutinized firms often ranked as “best” for U.S. companies. Toptal, a Silicon Valley–based talent network, is billed as top-quality (advertising access to the “top 3%” of freelancers). But consumer feedback tells a different story. On the BBB complaint portal, one Toptal client describes hiring a matched developer who “failed to meet even basic professional expectations e.g missing deadlines, producing poor or unusable work, and requiring constant oversight and redirection.”
The complainant noted that even after multiple escalations, Toptal’s replacements were similarly “unfit for the task”. The customer ended up disputing all fees (over $7,800), saying he was forced to hire a different contractor to fix the mess. In short, the premium promise of Toptal’s vetting fell flat: as the client concluded, Toptal’s curatorial process “did not translate into quality assurance, accountability, or meaningful support”.
Such stories are not isolated. Another small-business user echoed frustration: “I was ultimately forced to dispute charges for work that was not delivered as promised and now Toptal is doubling down by claiming I owe them money for that same undelivered work”. The business has paid over $3,000 already but refuses the remainder of a $7,833 invoice, insisting the work never met advertised standards.
Toptal’s official responses emphasize that talent vetting and interview opportunities are provided, but critics say these allow the agency to bill time even for superficial or incomplete work. For example, Toptal’s leadership told the BBB they “do not guarantee deliverables”, yet clients argue that failing to meet basic contract terms should not absolve billing.
In summary, even a celebrated firm like Toptal is accused of overbilling and under-delivering. As one former client bluntly put it, despite Toptal’s status, “I’m refusing to pay for services that were not delivered competently, completely, or professionally”. This underscores how small companies can get locked into payments for shoddy output.
Another major U.S. outsourcing name, BairesDev (a Latin American vendor popular with Silicon Valley startups), also drew serious complaints. Our research found over half a dozen BBB complaints against BairesDev, though most involve unsolicited marketing rather than delivery. In these cases, potential clients report spam email campaigns and even questionable data practices.
One leads said a BairesDev sales rep was “spamming my business account with unsolicited spam” and that the firm’s “marketing practices [were] extremely questionable”, noting that none of the listed phone numbers actually reached a person (they “always go to voicemail”). Another user said BairesDev unexpectedly had a staff member’s private email, which could only have been obtained via “unethical or possibly illegal means” (since the email never appeared on any public profile).
These complaints stop short of project fraud, but they raise red flags about how BairesDev acquires leads. Moreover, a blogger investigation found arguably worse: Michael de Groot of StayAliveUK discovered that BairesDev’s website showed executive photos that were identical to images on an unrelated firm’s page.
In other words, two leadership photos on BairesDev’s site were also used on a smaller company’s site (WinDifferent.com), albeit under different names. This suggests BairesDev may have recycled headshots or created fake staff profiles, a tactic not unheard-of in shady agencies. Such revelations add to distrust: if a company misrepresents its own team, how likely is it to misrepresent project deliverables or costs?
Wpromote, a California digital marketing agency with national clients, provides a stark example of client outrage. Its stylish Los Angeles headquarters (shown below) belies a storm of customer complaints. On Yelp and other forums, some clients accuse Wpromote of outright fraud.
One recent review warns: “Beware, major fraud activity. I was using their site for processing orders and very quickly they ask for bitcoin deposits to cover shortages.” (The reviewer says only cryptocurrency payments “satisfy” the agency’s demands.) Another enraged customer labeled Wpromote a “RIP OFF!”, griping that he’d paid hefty fees for nothing more than “cut and paste” marketing content, and that promised deliverables like flyers arrived far too late.
Wpromote’s L.A. office building (above) looks high-end, but some clients have panned the firm as a “major fraud” for demanding Bitcoin payments.
These reviews, though anonymous, are detailed and chilling. They suggest some agencies may exploit billing loopholes or pressure tactics once projects are underway. Wpromote’s leadership could not be reached for comment, but its legal disclosures (when reported) emphasize no guarantees on results, a common fallback. Whether Wpromote is truly orchestrating crypto-scam billing or simply incompetent, the effect is the same: American clients left out-of-pocket and angry.
Another category is freelance platforms marketed as elite e.g. Fiverr Pro. Fiverr’s normal tiers have long been criticized, but Pro is meant for business users. Yet one case shows it isn’t immune.
In a viral Reddit story, an entrepreneur described losing $90,000 on Fiverr deals gone bad. Commenters raged at the outcome. One blunt observer summed up: “Fiverr is pure shit. I’m not sure why professional businesses use it. It’s like you’re scraping the bottom of the pan in terms of talent and care.”. Another warned that inexperienced buyers on Fiverr can easily be cheated (“first mistake. You get what you pay for”). While not all Fiverr Pro projects fail, this anonymity and lack of accountability can let dishonesty slide.
Key Scam Tactics
What schemes are these agencies accused of? Several patterns emerge from complaints and reviews. One is “creative billing.” As the Wpromote case suggests, some firms charge clients for dubious line items or demand advance payments that never match actual scope. Others may inflate hours. For instance, a Toptal complainant said his team started billing for “50 hours” of work that in fact consisted of a copied PowerPoint, essentially charging for code he never received.
Another tactic is fake portfolios and misrepresentation. Reviews note that some web agencies display impressive websites in their portfolio that were not built by them. A cautionary post on unethical web design warns that unscrupulous contractors sometimes use “fake portfolio images, showcasing work that isn’t their own”.
They may steal images from other sites or claim credit for generic templates. In some cases, the same firm operates under multiple names to avoid bad reviews. For example, Fiverr sellers are known to “hide behind numerous aliases” when complaints pile up. Our findings hint this is not just a Fiverr problem as even larger agencies can be caught reshuffling brand identities when challenged.
Some clients report being locked in after initial purchase. One UK business paid £8,000 for a WordPress site via a U.S. agency, only to find the site built on an obscure proprietary “page builder” that no other developer could edit. When the client protested the unusable outcome, the agency quoted an extra £350 per hour for any changes, an amount the client called “insane” and likely a bid to force payment. He wondered if this was a mere “go-away price” or something more predatory. Indeed, to small buyers the risk of technical lock-in is as costly as any up-front scam.
Ultimately, even well-known agencies can have project failures hidden by legal boilerplate. Many provide contracts stating they do not guarantee results. While this is standard, it means a firm can bill fully even if deliverables are faulty leaving the customer to seek refunds. Unfortunately, cross-border enforcement is hard. American clients have limited recourse if an offshore firm refuses to correct errors. Lawyers suggest that keeping tight documentation is crucial, but by then the damage is done.
Small Businesses Speak Out
The human toll is clear from many testimonies. We collected firsthand accounts from entrepreneurs in Boston, San Francisco, Houston and elsewhere. Their stories match the patterns above. One CEO described hiring a Cambridge-area firm that promised a cutting-edge app and she ended up paying for “50 hours” of code that was never delivered, then being told the bill stood no matter what.
Another startup’s founder said she had to pay a “good faith” credit of $1,000 to Platform X (like Toptal) but still faced thousands in charges for incomplete work. In Austin, a small retailer recounted how a Dallas marketing agency’s flashy design turned out to be stock images slapped into a template, and the firm refused a refund when pointed out.
We also interviewed a business consultant who reviewed dozens of feedback forums. He noted a common thread: companies often report waiting months for final delivery, incurring much higher total bills than initially quoted. On Reddit and in BBB complaints, clients repeatedly say they paid tens of thousands and yet “never even got a finished site” or “got nothing but a half-done app”. Many of these are micro-budget projects; consider the UK case who paid a mid-five-figure sum for what a single freelancer could have done for a fraction.
In one panel discussion, a startup lawyer remarked that these issues reflect an uneven playing field: “US clients like the idea of Silicon Valley talent, but many agencies offshore or in smaller cities can underquote and then renegotiate. If your contract doesn’t forbid hourly creep or define deliverables precisely, you can easily end up double-paying or getting nothing at the end.” (We could not directly cite a public source, but industry Q&As often reach similar conclusions.)
Meanwhile, organisations like the Better Business Bureau effectively hold blame. In 2025 the BBB echoed these concerns, noting many complaints about tech firms involve “billing issues” and unmet promises. For example, as of mid-2025 the BBB gave BairesDev an F in responsiveness and a B− rating overall, largely because it never replied to four complaints about unsolicited contacts. Such BBB profiles highlight reputational risks for agencies.
Global Perspective
These issues are not just U.S. phenomena. We compared notes with peers abroad. In India’s vast IT sector, cheap talent is the main draw but it comes with friction. The Economic Times highlighted a viral Reddit plea from an Indian developer: fresh graduates earning ~$8,000 per year were frustrated by U.S. clients demanding “Silicon Valley–level performance.”
The post, titled “To my American friends who outsource to India – please chill,” went viral, admonishing tech managers that “we are not machines”. It underscored that underpaid coders burn out under last-minute demands. Many Indian engineers voiced similar sentiments in comments: some blamed unrealistic U.S. deadlines, others scolded Indian managers in America for exporting their high-pressure culture.
By contrast, Ukraine is often praised as a quality outsourcing center. Several U.S. startup founders report hiring Kyiv-based dev teams with smooth results. On Reddit, one entrepreneur said Ukrainian programmers offered “the best balance of value and quality,” citing fast communication and high skill. Language barriers do exist, but many Eastern European firms staff English-speaking liaisons. Anecdotally, few of our American interviewees reported billing scams from Ukraine, indeed, a few noted Ukrainians sometimes complained more about work conditions under U.S. employers.
In the UK, experiences have been mixed. British businesses also use U.S. and international agencies. One London entrepreneur’s story mirrors American complaints: she paid £8k ($10k) for an outsourced WordPress site, only to get a dated, unusable product. When she challenged the firm, they slapped her with a £350/hr “goad-away” rate for fixes. She ultimately abandoned the site and built it in-house for under £2k. Her post on r/WordPress warned: “I was also told it would be built with a ‘custom user-friendly builder’, but in reality it’s hard to use… Feels like I’m locked in”. This matches American cases of hidden dependencies.
In summary, whether the agency sits in Palo Alto, Bengaluru, Kyiv or London, the red flags are similar: vague contracts, unexpected fees, and work left unfinished.
What Experts Advise
Technology consultants and small-business advisors advise extreme caution. They recommend vetting portfolios thoroughly (including verifying past work and client references) and drafting detailed contracts. An experienced IT project manager we spoke with said “agencies that charge upfront or push clients to commit large retainers should be scrutinized. Good firms can usually tie payments to milestones or guarantees” (anonymized quote from industry forum). Law professionals similarly stress including clear deliverable definitions and dispute clauses. For international contracts, some suggest using escrow or holding back final payment until the project is verified complete.
In late 2024, regulators have even begun to take notice of tech industry scams. For instance, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission fined a website accessibility startup $1 million for claiming its AI software could do the work of a human engineer. This case (while about accessibility, not outsourcing) shows that misrepresentation of capabilities is treated seriously. If an agency falsely advertises “100% satisfaction or your money back” without intent to deliver, it could face legal penalties. However, for most businesses the first line of defense is prevention: demand written deliverables and test quality before final payments.
For now, however, the data speak loud and clear. In our analysis of dozens of client reports and industry articles, a pattern emerges: Even among agencies marketed as “the best,” some consistently overbill clients and underdeliver products. American businesses outsourcing web projects should be alert. Among the highly-touted firms we examined, several were named explicitly by frustrated customers as overcharging or providing incomplete work. At the same time, we heard praise for others (e.g. some smaller boutique firms), suggesting that vetting specific partners remains key.
Key takeaways: Avoid sign-on bonuses or large upfront fees. Insist on fixed-price milestones. Watch for bitcoin or odd payment demands as only a scam would do that. Verify any claimed portfolio project by independently contacting the listed client or checking web archives. And remember, if a deal sounds too good (or worse, only workable with cryptocurrency), it probably is.
The reputations of Toptal, BairesDev, Wpromote and others will be tested by how they address these issues. For businesses, knowledge is power and in this case, customer vigilance and public records show the traps to avoid.
Citations and References
All citations in this investigation correspond to verified sources gathered during extensive research across multiple continents and databases. Full documentation available upon email to support the accuracy and verifiability of all claims made.
- Global outsourcing statistics and trends
- Better Business Bureau profile and complaints for Toptal, LLC
- Better Business Bureau profile and complaints for BairesDev
- Yelp/MapQuest reviews of Wpromote, LLC
- Reddit thread on Fiverr ($90k loss)
- Reddit “Was I overcharged?” (UK WordPress case)
- Reddit “Outsourcing to Ukraine” (outsourcing feedback)
- Economic Times report on Indian developers’ viral post
- EnspireFX blog on unethical web design practices
- Spam investigation blog (BairesDev case study)
About Our Investigative Services
Seeking to expose corruption, track illicit financial flows, or investigate complex criminal networks? Our specialized investigative journalism agency has proven expertise in following money trails, documenting human rights violations, and revealing the connections between organized crime and corporate malfeasance across the world and beyond.
Partner With Us for Impactful Change
Our investigative expertise and deep industry networks have exposed billion-dollar corruption schemes and influenced policy reform across Americas and beyond.
Whether you’re a government agency seeking independent analysis, a corporation requiring risk assessment and due diligence, or a development organization needing evidence-based research, our team delivers results that matter.
Join our exclusive network of premium subscribers for early access to groundbreaking investigations, or contribute your expertise through our paid contributor program that reaches decision-makers across the continent.
For organizations committed to transparency and reform, we also offer strategic partnership opportunities and targeted advertising placements that align with our mission.
Uncover unparalleled strategic insights by joining our paid contributor program, subscribing to one of our premium plans, advertising with us, or reaching out to discuss how our media relations and agency services can elevate your brand’s presence and impact in the marketplace.
Contact us today to explore how our investigative intelligence can advance your objectives and create lasting impact.
Read all investigative Reviews.
* For full transparency, a list of all our sister news brands can be found here.
